LONG LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

DRAFT BOARD MEETING MINUTES

Date: March 26, 2009

Time: 6:00 p.m.

Type of Meeting: Special

Place: High School Library

Members Present: Jules Comeau, President

Hallie Bond

Hillarie Logan-Dechene

Kimberly Miller

Donna Clark

Others Present: Kevin Crampton-Superintendent, Tina Pine, Duane Finch, Maureen LoPresti, Pete Klein, Camille Nerney, Tisha White, Michael Farrell

Call to Order:

The president called the meeting to order at 6:06 p.m. and followed with the pledge of allegiance.

Public Comment: None

Motion to go into Executive Session by Hillarie Logan-Dechene, seconded by Hallie Bond, with all in favor at 6:08 p.m. Items to be discussed: personnel issues.

Motion to come out of Executive Session by Donna Clark, seconded by Hallie Bond, with all in favor at 9:55 p.m.

Approved: On Motion by Donna Clark, seconded by Hallie Bond, with all in favor, two unused snow days to the school vacation calendar on May 11, 2009 and May 22, 2009.

Approved: On Motion by Hillarie Logan-Dechene, seconded by Kimberly Miller, with all in favor, to place a proposition to the voters in May 2009 for a Phase 2 Plumbing Improvement project at a cost not to exceed $275,000 and the following resolution regarding the capital project:

WHEREAS, the Board of Education of the Long Lake Central School District (“Board”) has proposed to undertake a project involving the repair and/or replacement of the Plumbing Systems – Phase 2 at the Long Lake K-12 School building (“the Project”); and

WHEREAS, the Board wishes to fully comply with its obligations under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) and the regulations thereunder with respect to the proposed action, in its capacity as Lead Agency; and

WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered the nature and scope of the proposed action; and

WHEREAS, upon review of the foregoing, the Board makes the following determinations:

1. The proposed action involves the repair and/or replacement of the Plumbing Systems – Phase 2 at the Long Lake K-12 School building.

2. The proposed project represents maintenance or repair involving no substantial changes in an existing facility or structure within the meaning of 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(1); and/or alternatively the replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction of a structure or facility in kind within the meaning of 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(2); or alternatively, a routine activity of an educational institution, including the expansion of existing facilities by less than 10,000 square feet, within the meaning of 6 NYCRR § 617.5(c)(8).

3. The proposed action will in no case have a significant adverse impact on the environment based on the criteria contained in 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c), and is not otherwise a Type I action as defined by 6 NYCRR § 617.4.

4. The proposed action is a Type II action within the meaning of 6 NYCRR 617.5 and is therefore not subject to review under SEQRA and the regulations thereunder.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board finds and concludes that the proposed action is a Type II action within the meaning of 6 NYCRR 617.5 and therefore is not subject to review under SEQRA and the regulations thereunder.

Mr. Jules Comeau, Board President, stated that Mr. Crampton has chosen to return to his family. Details will be worked out at a later date.

Public Comment: None

Adjournment: On Motion by Donna Clark, seconded by Hillarie Logan-Dechene, with all in favor, the Board adjourned at 10:05 p.m.

Acting Clerk of the Board Clerk of the Board

Jules Comeau Victoria J. Snide